One Sunday, at worship, the pastor of a small village says :
– Next week, I will give my sermon on lying. To learn more about this sin, I invite you to read and prepare the passage from the gospel of Mark, chapter 17.
The following Sunday arrives and as he prepares to take the pulpit to preach, the pastor asks the question to the congregation:
Who among you has read St Mark, chapter 17 ? And everyone raises their hand.
The pastor smiles and says:
– The gospel of Mark contains only 16 chapters. So now you are all ready to hear my sermon on this sin that is lying!
The original in French is found on Nouchi.com . Adapted and Translated to English by Dr. Y. Afrolegends.com
On vous invite à accompagner à la chasse, parce qu’on a vu vos filets (proverbe Ntomba – République Démocratique du Congo (RDC)). – On est aimé quand on a beaucoup de choses.
We invite you to go hunting, because we have seen your nets (Ntomba proverb – Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)). – We are loved when we have many things.
Two weeks before his murder, on January 4th 1961, Patrice Lumumba wrote from prison in Thysville (now Mbanza-Ngungu) to Rajeshwar Dayal, a Special Representative to the UN Secretary General. In prison, Lumumba was accompanied by Maurice Mpolo and Joseph Okito, two political associates who had planned to assist him in setting up a new government. They were fed poorly by the prison guards, as per Mobutu’s orders. In one of Lumumba’s last documented letter, he wrote to Dayal who was the head of the United Nations Operation in the Congo: “In a word, we are living amid absolutely impossible conditions; moreover, they are against the law.”
=====
LETTER TO M. DAYAL, SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE U.N. SECRETARY-GENERAL Thysville, January 4, 1961
Mr. Special Representative,
On December 27 last, I had the pleasure of receiving a visit from the Red Cross, which occupied itself with my plight and with the plight of the other parliamentarians imprisoned together with me. I told them of the inhuman conditions we are living in.
Lumumba detained
Briefly, the situation is as follows. I am here with seven other parliamentarians. In addition there are with us Mr. Okito, President of the Senate, a Senate employee and a driver. Altogether there are ten of us. We have been locked up in damp cells since December 2, 1960, and at no time have we been permitted to leave them. The meals that we are brought twice a day are very bad. For three or four days 1 ate nothing but a banana. I told this to the Red Cross medical officer sent to me. I spoke to him in the presence of a colonel from Thysville. I demanded that fruit be bought on my own money because the food that I am given here is atrocious. Although the medical officer gave his permission, the military authorities guarding me turned down my request, stating that they were following orders from Kasavubu and Colonel Mobutu. The medical officer from Thysville prescribed a short walk every evening so that I could leave my cell for at least a little while. But the colonel and the district commissioner denied me this. The clothes that I wear have not been washed for thirty-five days. I am forbidden to wear shoes.
In a word, the conditions we are living in are absolutely intolerable and run counter to all rules.
Moreover, I receive no news of my wife and I do not even know where she is. Normally I should have had regular visits from her as is provided for by the prison regulations in force in the Congo. On the other hand, the prison regulations clearly state that not later than a day after his arrest a prisoner must be brought before the investigator handling his case. Five days after this a prisoner must again be arraigned before a judge, who must decide whether to remand him in custody or not. In any case, a prisoner must have a lawyer.
The criminal code provides that a prisoner is released from prison if five days after he is taken into custody the judge takes no decision on remanding him. The same happens in cases when the first decision (which is taken five days after a person is arrested) is not reaffirmed within fifteen days. Since our arrest on December 1 and to this day we have not been arraigned before a judge or visited by a judge. No arrest warrant has been shown to us. We are kept simply in a military camp and have been here for thirty-four days. We are kept in military detention cells.
The criminal code is ignored as are the prison rules. Ours is purely a case of arbitrary imprisonment. I must add that we possess parliamentary immunity.
Such is the situation and I ask you to inform the United Nations Secretary-General of it.
I remain calm and hope the United Nations will help us out of this situation.
I stand for reconciliation between all the children of this country.
I am writing this letter secretly on bad paper. I have the honour to be, etc.
Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso’s leaders met on July 6, 2024 in Niamey, Niger, as part of the first summit of the Alliance des Etats du Sahel (AES – Alliance of the Sahel States). During the summit, the three leaders signed a confederation treaty aimed at strengthening the links between the three nations in terms of defence, and other aspects such as the economy, infrastructures, and more. They reinforced their mutual defence pact. This is a pivotal moment whih marks a new era, and we rejoice for Mali, Niger and Burkina Faso, and the whole of Africa.
The military leaders of Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger have hailed a newly signed treaty as a step “towards greater integration” between the three countries, in the latest showing of their shift away from traditional regional and Western allies.
During a summit in the Nigerien capital of Niamey on Saturday, the three leaders signed a confederation treaty that aims to strengthen a mutual defence pact announced last year, the Alliance of Sahel States (AES).
The signing capped the first joint summit of the leaders – Niger’s General Abdourahmane Tchiani, Burkina Faso’s Captain Ibrahim Traore, and Mali’s Colonel Assimi Goita – since they came to power in successive coups in their bordering West African nations.
… Speaking at the summit on Saturday, Tchiani called the 50-year-old ECOWAS “a threat to our states”.
… “We are going to create an AES of the peoples, instead of an ECOWAS whose directives and instructions are dictated to it by powers that are foreign to Africa,” Tchiani said.
Flag of Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso’s Traore also accused foreign powers of seeking to exploit the countries. The three nations have regularly accused former colonial ruler France of meddling in ECOWAS.
“Westerners consider that we belong to them and our wealth also belongs to them. They think that they are the ones who must continue to tell us what is good for our states,” he said.
“This era is gone forever. Our resources will remain for us and our population’s.”
… For his part, Mali’s Goita said the strengthened relationship means an “attack on one of us will be an attack on all the other members”.
… The Niamey summit also came a day before the United States is set to complete its withdrawal from a key base in Niger, underscoring how the new military leaders have redrawn security relations that had defined the region in recent years.
… French troops completed their withdrawal from Mali in 2022, and they left Niger and Burkina Faso last year.
Meanwhile, US Air Force Major General Kenneth Ekman said earlier this week that about 1,000 military personnel would complete their withdrawal from Niger’s Air Base 101 by Sunday.
The US is also in the process of leaving a separate, $100m drone base near Agadez in central Niger, which officials have described as essential to gathering intelligence about armed groups in the region.
Un faux pas de celui qui précède avertit ceux qui sont derrière(Proverbe Bayombe – Angola, République Démocratique du Congo (RDC), République du Congo, Zambie). – Un homme avertit en vaut deux.
A misstep by the one in front warns those behind(Bayombe proverb – Angola, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Republic of Congo, Zambia). – Forewarned is forearmed.
A few years ago, after the horrors of the electoral crisis in Cote d’Ivoire and the bombing of its presidential palace with the capture of President Laurent Gbagbo and First Lady Simone Gbagbo, I watched a video interview of the Franco-Cameroonian journalist Charles Onana who was talking about his book “Côte d’Ivoire : le coup d’État, Duboiris, 2011 (with a preface by Thabo Mbeki).” At the end of the interview, Onana stated, “… Quand vous avez un pays riche qui est convoité par des multinationales, par des groupes mafieux, par des états, etc, vous devez décupler votre intelligence pour défendre votre pays. … En face vous avez des équipes de think-tanks qui sont là pour penser comment destabiliser le pays, donc les Africains ne peuvent pas faire l’économie d’un travail acharné, d’un travail surhumain pour s’en sortir … Pendant que la crise se calme ou s’apaise, les autres continuent de travailler pour vous destabiliser, ils refléchissent à d’autres stratégies, mais il faut que [les Africains] apprennent à refléchir à differentes stratégies de manière à ce que le Président de la République ne se retrouve pas toujours seul à penser à tout, seul à reflechir à tout, …” [When you are a rich country that is coveted by multinationals, by mafia groups, by states, etc, you must increase your intelligence tenfold to defend your country. … On the other side, you have think-tank teams that are thinking ways to destabilize the country, so Africans cannot avoid hard work, superhuman work to be free … When the crisis calms down or subsides, others continue to work to destabilize you, they think other strategies, but Africans too need to think different strategies so that the President of the Republic does not always find himself thinking not the only one think all by himself, …]
The New Scramble for Africa (Source: Source: Dr Jack & Curtis for City Press, National Institute African Studies (NIAS))
With the New Scramble for Africa, African countries should have think-tanks, the enemy has think-tanks strategizing over decades, how come we, Africans, do not? Even in times of peace, we should be strategizing… as we heard the French general, it is clear that they are already planning the defeat of Africa, and the return of Africans into their fold in 10 years… how come? When Sekou Toure said NO to the General De Gaulle and Guinea gained independence, not only were the French busy destabilizing his regime politically, militarily, arming his local opponents, but they even flooded his economy with fake currency to destroy his own free Guinean Franc (as he had said NO to the slave currency that is FCFA); the attacks were non stop for several decades, and honestly, are still going on. Thus, Africans, we need to gain our independence, and for our independence to be complete, we need to have strategies for the immediate day-to-day events, but also long-term, over 20-50 or even 100 years. It took China 100 years to get back Hong-Kong and Macau from Great Britain and Portugal… that happened because of a clear vision and strategy of defense against the enemy and reclaiming of lands.
On Friday, it was announced that the French Army has now created an African Command center to deal with current issues on the continent; it is believed to be in response to them being chased out of Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger. This new creation would be similar to the American AFRICOM. Although, it appears to be new, in reality, it is just like an iceberg which is now showing out its visible side for all to see. There have always been French forces on African soil, there has always been a cell meant to deal with Africa (militarily) in the French government; that is how the Francafrique happened! Now, in view of the loss of uranium from Niger, gold from Mali, many other resources from Burkina Faso, France is starting to lose its place among the top nations of this world, and quickly needs to try to regain the upper hand in its former colonies. Of course, the big reason (lie) given for this is, to help partner countries in the fight against terrorism (terrorism brought to us by them).
The French army has established a Command for Africa, similar to what the American armys have already done for a long time [AFRICOM], at a pivotal moment in the French military presence, in sharp decline on the continent, according to the Official Journal (JO).
… This unprecedented creation in France of an Africa Command comes as Paris plans to reduce its military presence in West and Central Africa to a few hundred men [reduce? Maybe transform the official army and soldiers into mercenaries as it was done with Bob Denard and co?], within the framework of “renovated” and more discreet partnerships [renovated, discreet? sounds more like the Bob Denard style or Elf?].
So is the redeployment of French forces in West and Central Africa at the origin of this creation? This is indeed the primary reason, because until now the French elements in Chad, Senegal, Ivory Coast and Gabon each had a combined regional arms staff.
However, this permanent military presence is no longer in keeping with the times. The French contingent in Africa must, in the near future, be reduced to the bare minimum. …
… The concern for discretion is indeed the first desired effect. Informational attacks have made the French army radioactive [this foreign army works for foreign interests and thus has always been radioactive for African countries]. To change the situation, the army general staff wants to “reduce visibility and footprint”: very logically, this Africa Command will therefore be based in Paris.
But the objectives remain unchanged. This Command will be intended to organize support for partner countries in the fight against terrorism and the expansion of trafficking, the training of regional armies, and the access strategy. … the French military personnel will evolve according to needs and missions, but always in close collaboration with the host countries.
As always, ahead of June 30, the ‘independence’ day of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), we write about Patrice Emery Lumumba, the first Prime Minister of Congo. This time, we will take a trip down memory lane with the great article by the prominent anti-colonial thinker, activist and writer, Frantz Fanon, which was published earlier here on Afrolegends in French in 2011. (You will find the original here). In view of all the events occurring in Africa (The New Scramble for Africa, Creation of the AES and destabilization attempts) with the United Nations (UN) approval, I thought that this article, published in 1964, was so important that I had translated it into English for all to read! In the article, Fanon talks about the kind of Africans who betray their people, and the uselessness (to us, Africans) of the UN which only serves Western interests. The scenario is the same and has not changed over the past 6 decades: wherever the UN lands in a country, all of sudden there are troubles, tensions, massacres, (ONUCI, MINUSMA, MONUSCO, …), etc. Enjoy… For the full article, check out: Lumumba’s death: Could we (Africans) have acted differently?
—————————————————
Frantz Fanon
The great success of the enemies of Africa is to have corrupted the Africans themselves. It is true that these Africans had vested interest in the murder of Lumumba. Heads of puppet governments, in a fake independence, faced everyday by massive opposition from their peoples, it did not take long to convince themselves that the real independence of the Congo would put them personally at risk. And there were other Africans, a little less puppet, but who get frightened when it comes to disengaging Africa from the West. It seems as if these African Heads of State are still afraid to face Africa. These, also, though less actively, but consciously, contributed to the deterioration of the situation in Congo. Little by little, we were reaching the agreement in the West that there was a need to intervene in Congo, we could not let things evolve at this pace.
Gradually, the idea of a UN intervention was taking shape. So we can say today that two simultaneous errors were committed by Africans.
Patrice Lumumba
And first by Lumumba when he sought the intervention of the UN. He should have never called on the United Nations.The UN has never been able to properly solve problems brought to man’s consciousness by colonialism, and whenever it has intervened, it was to actually come to the aid of the colonial power to the oppressed country. Look at Cameroon. What kind of peace do the subjects of Mr. Ahidjo kept in check by a French expeditionary force, which most of the time, made its debut in Algeria, enjoy? The UN, however, controlled the autodetermination of Cameroon and the French government has set up a “Provisional Executive” there.
Look at Viet-Nam. Look at Laos.
It is not true to say that the UN fail because the causes are too difficult.
Map of the Democratic Republic of Congo
In reality the UN is the legal card used by imperialist interests when brute force has failed. The sharing, the mixed controlled joint committees, under guardianship are international means of torture to break the will of the people, cultivating anarchy, banditry and misery.
… Lumumba’s fault was then initially to believe in the impartiality of the UN. He forgot that the UN, particularly in the current state, is only a reserve assembly established by the Greats to continue, between two armed conflicts, the “peaceful struggle” for the balkanization of the world. …
Africans should remember this lesson. If outside help is necessary to us, let us call on our friends. Only they can truly and fully help us achieve our goals precisely because the friendship between us is a friendship of struggles.
… Our mistake, as Africans, is to have forgotten that the enemy never backs down sincerely. He never understands. He surrenders, but is not converted.
Our mistake is to have believed that the enemy had lost its militancy and its harmfulness. If Lumumba disturbs, Lumumba should disappear.
Hesitation in commiting murder has never been a feature of imperialism.
African Heritage 